The Politics of Attire: Trump's Blue Suit and the Evolution of Dress Codes
by Murray Crane
As those versed in sartorial history understand, dress codes have always transcended mere guidelines. From ancient Rome's status-signalling togas to the sombre black suits of modern state funerals, they function as visual shorthand for respect, hierarchy, and belonging. Yet in contemporary society, where personal branding often eclipses traditional protocol, even the colour of a suit can become a political statement worthy of examination.
At Pope Francis's recent funeral, U.S. President Donald Trump arrived in a blue suit and matching tie, creating a distinct visual contrast against the assembly of black-clad dignitaries. The Vatican's long-established protocol prescribes dark suits with black ties for men attending papal funerals—a guideline that, while technically accommodating Trump's choice, has historically been interpreted specifically as calling for black attire.
This distinction matters. The Vatican's dress code represents centuries of tradition refined to communicate appropriate reverence. Men are expected to appear in a dark suit, white shirt, and long black tie for such solemn occasions. Other leaders, including Prince William and former President Joe Biden, also wore dark blue suits, yet Trump's notably brighter hue commanded significantly more attention—illustrating how identical deviations from protocol carry different weight depending on the wearer.
The situation carries a particular irony. Trump recently ejected a visitor from the White House for failing to meet what he deemed appropriate attire standards—a striking contrast to his apparent willingness to interpret established protocol through his own lens. This juxtaposition offers a fascinating glimpse into how dress codes simultaneously serve as both rigid frameworks and flexible constructs, depending on who wields the authority to interpret them.
For students of political imagery, the varying reactions to different leaders' similar choices highlights something that master tailors have long understood: context and proportion matter enormously. Beyond the garments themselves, public perception is shaped by the wearer's established persona, their position, and the broader cultural narrative surrounding them.
This incident raises thoughtful questions about the evolving significance of dress codes in ceremonial settings. Like a well-cut suit, traditional guidelines continue to serve as important structural elements that communicate respect and cultural awareness—particularly at events as solemn as a papal funeral.
As society continues to redefine formality and appropriateness, so too will the codes that govern our attire. This progression reflects an ongoing dialogue between honouring established traditions and accommodating contemporary sensibilities. What remains constant, however, is clothing's remarkable capacity to communicate—sometimes more eloquently than words—our respect for occasions, institutions, and the shared cultural values that bind us together.


View more Dispatch posts
Back to DispatchJoe Caroff
Joe Caroff, the designer behind some of cinema’s most enduring images, has died in New York aged 103. In 1962 he turned the curve of a “7” into the barrel...
Room With a View
If you happen to be in Melbourne next week, the Spring 1883 Art Fair (13 - 16 August) at the Hotel Windsor is worth a look. The Hotel suites are...
Sunday, Served Right
I’m really loving Sunday lunches lately. There’s something about the slower pace that feels like a small luxury — no midweek pressure, no clock-watching, just time to enjoy a proper...